Oral Evidence and the Rule of Direct Evidence The rule of direct evidence states that the direct presentation of evidence is sufficient to support a legal c...
Oral Evidence and the Rule of Direct Evidence
The rule of direct evidence states that the direct presentation of evidence is sufficient to support a legal conclusion, and that the admission of secondary evidence requires a showing of relevance and admissibility.
Direct evidence is any physical or documentary evidence presented in court, such as witness testimonies, physical exhibits, and documents.
Relevant evidence is evidence that is directly relevant to the case and supports the inference of a fact in question.
Admissible evidence is evidence that is received in a proper chain of custody, is properly introduced into the court, and is relevant to the case.
In summary, the rule of direct evidence says that if there is direct evidence of a fact in the case, it can be presented in court without the need for further admission of evidence. However, if there is no direct evidence, the admission of secondary evidence, such as witness testimony or expert reports, requires a showing of relevance and admissibility